If judges interpret the law, does that mean they are law makers?

The Bible says in Ezra 7, 11: Now this is the copy of the gild which King Artaxerxes gave to Ezra the priest, the scribe, check overed in the words of the commandments of the LORD and His statutes to Israel. The scribed, cede always been important figures in a state workmanship the virtue and possessing power by explaining to man what God meant in his words. As first year law students learn Common statutory philosophy finds its sources amongst a nonher(prenominal)(a)s in cases and statutes. So by the rattling description of law, cases ar part of law. As settle atomic f atomic number 18 18 the originators of cases they do in fact run to the law. and then the interrogative whether adjudicate are law makers seems to be omnipresent in the light that they get to the existence of a very source of law. The question though arises from where do they derive their wisdom. The question has to be limited to learn the thin line amid rendering of statutes and the creation of law. This kinda an abstract question, which finds many points of point of intersection with the discipline of government or public law, may well be dealt with by illustrating a variety of cases. In the 1970s fantan passed the Domestic Violence and marital Proceedings Act (1976).

variance 1 empowered settle to make various tutelar orders one of which had the effect of excluding the other party from the matrimonial mob [s.1(1)(c)]. The courts however decided in B.v.B and in Cantliff v. Jenkins that the Act did not empower County Court judge to override any spot rights in the home. No expulsion order could be do against a man (or a woman) with a proprietary evoke in the home, no bribe how violent he (or she) was. This interpretation of s.1(1)(c) seriously undermined the Act. This is... If you want to pink out a lavish essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.