Points Of View

Points of View Aeschylus faces off with Euripides in a dramatic know and is decl ard the victor. The decision is one of cosmetics more(prenominal) than substance. Aeschylus wrote plays that appealed to the heap of Athens. The Oresteia is a drool with toilsome characters faced with difficult decisions in which rightness prevails. On the other hand, Euripides wrote plays that were more realistic, such as The Electra, which reveals the helplessness of men and women. That both authors wrote plays dealing with the same story helps us to pull in the differences in their tactual sensations and styles. The Oresteia likely was favoured more by the Athenian people because of some key situationors. One of these is character portrayal. Aeschylus make his heroes strong minded and unspoilt of resolve, whereas Euripides tended to show his characters shortcomings. An example of this is the character of Orestes. In The Libation Bearers, Orestes comes upon the picture and makes himsel f cognise to his baby immediately and right extraneous reveals his plot to kill their tiros murderers. He is in control of the incidental and prepared to kill both his mother and her lover: Our vexation who is never starved for blood shall drink/ for the third mag a cupful of unwatered blood (Libation Bearers, Lines 577-578). Orestes would contribute appealed to the Athenian ground because of his strength and his desire to avenge the murder of his make and wrap up the oracle of Apollo. In The Electra, Euripides creates a in rightfulness(prenominal) different magnetic inclination for Orestes than does Aeschylus. Orestes does non burst onto the scene and immediately make himself know to his sister. He actu accessory does not volitioningly reveal himself. It is not until his honest-to-god tutor comes and recognises him that he admits to Electra that he is her brother. This essential(prenominal) have distressed an Athenian auditory sense to see the son of Agame mnon secrecy his identity operator operat! or from his sister for quite a long folder of dialogue. When his identity is know, it must have been very(prenominal) disheartening to see the reason Greek leaders son being so indecisive. Orestes cannot wait to guess or act for himself: Whom shall I make/ my ally? Shall I act by night or by mean solar day? What path shall I/ take over against my foes? (Electra, Lines 599-601). Oresetes weak will shows itself again when he sees his mother coming and cries out: Orestes: persuade! We must revise our plan./ Electra: What is it? Do you see reinforcements from Mycenae?/ Orestes: No, but the mother, the char that gave me/ drive home (Electra, Lines 963-967). Orestes reluctantly slays his mother only after a neat deal of pushing by his anxious sister. This scene is very different from Aeschylus, where Orestes needs no such spurring from his sister to avenge their fathers murder. Electra is another character that probably did not come along Euripides all votes from his a udience. In The Oresteia, Electra lives in the same dwelling can as her mother and holds the shocking position of a kings lesser girl all the same though her father is dead. In Euripedes variate of the story, Electra was consider out from the royal house, marries a fry, and is dressed in the rags of poverty. Also, she complains forever and a day about her low status. all told by means ofout the beginning pages she tells the audience of her woes, raising questions as to her motives for having her brother return and her mother killed. This is close obvious in the conversation with her brother, his identity still concealed, in which she must talk out of her grievous fortunes to Orestes. Interestingly, the murder of her father ranks behind the put up of her clothes, the hovel in which she lives, the work she must do (even though the gentlemans gentleman she marries offered to do it all for her), the particular that she can not affableize at the holy festivals, and the fact that her mother is queen. These selfish comp! laints are very different from the Electra of The Oresteia who speaks of her father first and also of the powers of Force, and Right,/ and genus Zeus almighty (The Libation Bearers, Lines 244-245). A secondment area in which Aeschylus probably won the favour of the judge is the destruction scenes of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus and the events follo encourageg their deaths. In The Oresteia, Orestes confronts both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus individually and kills them. Then, in The Eumenides, the play is devoted to decision making whether the matricide committed by Orestes is justified. The annunciation of this play is the recognition of the Furies as justice of an older time, and genus Athene entrusts them their rightful place in modern justice. Euripides treats the deaths of Clytemnestra and Aegisthus very differently. First, Euripides gives a detailed description of the death of Aegisthus, which at the time was not a popular issue with the audience. The way Orestes stabbed Aegisthus in the concealment probably did not win any point from the judge either. Then, after Orestes slays his mother, the mood is very different from that of The Oresteia.

Orestes and Electra both get that what they did was not justified even by the oracle of Apollo and mourning their actions. This is quite different from the tough Orestes of The Oresteia. Euripides even dares to blame it on Apollo: Castor: Clever he is, but what he required of/ you was not clever (Electra, Lines 1243-1244). The remainder of the play is very rude and does not give much(prenominal) detail about the futurity for Orestes or Electra. The play leaves the reviewer questioning if justice truly was s erved. Aeschylus would win the contest in Athens bec! ause Athenians would call for to position more with his play. Aeschylus provides for the audience a play of heroic actions, nobleman characters, and the development of justice, which is a very pleasing image for Athenians. Euripides, on the other hand, questions the nobility of wealthiness and the actions of his heroic characters. Also, Euripides writes some daring, less-traveled things in his plays, such as the scene in The trojan Women when Athena asks Poseidon to help her avenge the Greeks by causing a giant storm on their voyage home. I think Euripides is punter suited to pay off Athens from moral end because of the underlying values in his plays. In The Electra, Euripides uses the character of the grouch to show that wealth does not mean strength of character. The peasant shows that even a slimy man can be noble and honourable, and in my opinion is more honourable than any of the other characters who are considered noble because of their royal lineage. Euripides pla ys contain more realism than Aeschylus plays, and I gestate they give better acumen into the moral problems of the common man than does a play that has characters that appear more mythical than real. The truth can sometimes be ugly, and Euripides tries to convey reality in its raw form through his plays. He also helps to give insights on some remedies for fond problems. The Trojan Women is a hot example of how Euripides shows the audience the dark of war through the look of Hecuba, coming at a time when Athens is preparing a military campaign in Syracuse. Euripides focuses on moral and social issues far more than Aeschylus does and that is why he would be better suited to save Athens. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay